Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 06:31

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Does Taylor Swift actually play the guitar, or is it a prop?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Why is my ex mad I moved on when he dumped me?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Acting NASA Administrator Janet Petro ‘Embrace The Challenge’ Update June 6, 2025 - NASA Watch
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What did Starbucks and Dunkin' Donuts do wrong in Sweden?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Jonathan Joss, ‘King of the Hill’ and ‘Parks & Recreation’ actor, dead at 59 after shooting - CNN
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
F1 reveals 2026 calendar as Madrid replaces Imola - Motorsport.com
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.